The heart, a tireless engine driving our circulatory system, comprises four chambers: two atria and two ventricles. While the left ventricle (LV) has traditionally garnered the lion's share of clinical attention, the right ventricle (RV) plays an equally crucial role in maintaining systemic homeostasis. Understanding the intricacies of both LV and RV function, particularly their similarities and differences in response to adverse loading and subsequent failure, is critical for accurate diagnosis and effective management of cardiovascular diseases. This review delves into the anatomical, physiological, and molecular aspects of LV and RV function, highlighting their unique characteristics and comparing their responses to various forms of stress.
Right Ventricle Anatomy and Physiology: A Unique Chamber
Unlike the LV, which is a thick-walled, high-pressure pump, the RV possesses a distinct anatomy and physiology tailored to its role in pulmonary circulation. The RV is characterized by its crescent-shaped morphology, thinner walls, and lower systolic pressure compared to the LV. This structural difference reflects its function: to pump deoxygenated blood to the lungs for oxygenation. The RV's wall is significantly thinner because the pulmonary vascular resistance is substantially lower than the systemic vascular resistance encountered by the LV. This lower pressure system allows the RV to function efficiently with less muscular mass.
The RV's structure is intimately linked to its function. Its trabecular structure, composed of intricate meshwork of muscle bundles, contributes to its ability to adapt to varying preload and afterload conditions. These trabeculae provide structural support and enhance contractile efficiency. The RV also displays a unique arrangement of muscle fibers, which contributes to its ability to generate substantial stroke volume despite its relatively thin walls. The inflow tract, responsible for receiving blood from the right atrium, is relatively compliant, allowing for efficient filling. The outflow tract, leading to the pulmonary artery, is more muscular and contributes to the generation of sufficient pressure to propel blood into the pulmonary circulation.
Normal RV Size and Function: Establishing Baseline Parameters
Assessing normal RV size and function requires a multi-faceted approach incorporating various imaging modalities such as echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), and cardiac computed tomography (CT). Normal RV size is typically assessed using parameters such as RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and RV end-systolic volume (RVESV), often indexed to body surface area to account for individual variations. Normal values for these parameters vary depending on the imaging modality and the specific reference population.
Normal RV systolic function is characterized by efficient ejection of blood into the pulmonary artery. Key parameters used to assess RV systolic function include RV ejection fraction (RVEF), which represents the percentage of blood ejected from the RV with each contraction, and RV fractional shortening (RVFS), which quantifies the degree of RV shortening during systole. Normal RVEF values typically range from 45% to 60%, although this can vary depending on the methodology and population studied. A comprehensive assessment of RV function also includes the evaluation of RV contractility, which reflects the inherent ability of the RV myocardium to generate force.
Right Ventricle Structure and Function: Interdependence and Adaptation
The structure and function of the RV are intimately intertwined. Any alteration in one directly impacts the other. For example, RV dilation, often seen in conditions such as pulmonary hypertension, can lead to impaired contractile function. This occurs because the increased wall stress associated with dilation can compromise myocardial fiber shortening and efficiency. Conversely, conditions affecting RV contractility, such as myocardial infarction affecting the right ventricle, can lead to RV dilation as the heart attempts to compensate for reduced contractile performance. This intricate interplay underscores the importance of considering both structural and functional parameters when assessing RV health.
current url：https://glurjx.e847z.com/all/lv-and-rv-function-95052